Articles

Original Article

Risk Factors of Patients with Prostate Cancer Upgrading for International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group I After Radical Prostatectomy

Abdurrahman Özgür
Günal Özgür
Bahadır Şahin
Deniz Filinte
İlker Tinay
Haydar Kamil Çam
Levent Türkeri

Bull Urooncol 2022; 21: 10-13 DOI: 10.4274/uob.galenos.2021.2021.8.3

Comparison of Cognitive-targeted Biopsy and Systematic Prostate Biopsy for Predicting Radical Prostatectomy Pathology: Upgrading-downgrading and Concordance Rates

Eriz Özden
Arif İbiş
Çağrı Akpınar
Eralp Kubilay
Duygu Kankaya
Sümer Baltacı
Çağatay Göğüs

Bull Urooncol 2021; 20: 87-91 DOI: 10.4274/uob.galenos.2020.1936

Clinical and Histopathological Features of Genitourinary Sarcomas: Our Experiences and Case Series at a Single Center

İsmail Selvi
Eşref Oğuz Güven

Bull Urooncol 2019; 18: 93-98 DOI: 10.4274/uob.galenos.2019.1193

Article - Comment

The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma

Duygu Düsmez Apa

Bull Urooncol 2006; 5: 22-25

Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma

Kutsal Yörükoglu

Bull Urooncol 2007; 6: 37-38

Original Articles

Preoperative Factors Related to Stage and Grade Increase in D’Amico Low-Risk and Intermediate-Risk Group Patients

Serdar Çelik
Ozan Bozkurt
Ömer Demir
Burçin Tuna
Kutsal Yörükoğlu
Güven Aslan

Bull Urooncol 2016; 15: 148-153 DOI: 10.4274/uob.738

Review

Fuhrman Nuclear Grading System Overview in Renal Cell Carcinoma

Oğuz Özden Cebeci
Tayyar Alp Özkan
Ahmet Tuğrul Eruyar

Bull Urooncol 2014; 13: 157-160 DOI: 10.4274/uob.107

General Urooncology

Evaluation of complications in urooncologic surgeries and recommended criterias

Cenk Acar
Ali Ersin Zümrütbas

Bull Urooncol 2012; 11: 289-294

About Journal

Forms

Useful Links

Latest Update: 04.04.2024